Clarifying user intent

The user's message in Chinese seems to refer to a soccer transfer involving Napoli and Frattesi. I'm considering my response options since it's not clear if they want a summary, confirmation, or more details about this report. It feels best to ask a clarifying question while still offering multiple options for them to choose from. I need to remember we can't browse unless specified, but the default assumption is that I'm enabled to access the network.Asking for clarification

It’s best for me to ask what the user specifically needs regarding this soccer transfer news. They might want verification, player background, tactical fit, transfer feasibility, potential fees, or other options. I should provide brief context: Anguissa is a Napoli midfielder, and Frattesi is an Inter midfielder. It may be challenging for Napoli to target him given his current club situation. I think it's important not to present unverified information as facts, labeling anything as a rumor and offering to check sources if I can.Presenting options clearly

I want to give the user some options like: 1) verify with reputable sources, 2) provide a quick profile and tactical fit, 3) analyze the transfer's feasibility, 4) compile a potential timeline, and 5) compare alternatives or replacements. I should ask a brief clarifying question and remind them that the information is a rumor. I’ll avoid heavy markdown, using simple bullet points instead. Regarding Anguissa, it appears he could have been injured during the AFCON timeframe, which is worth checking.Asking for clarification

It’s best to ask the user what they need before I list my options. I could offer them options like: 1) verify original sources and details, 2) assess feasibility and cost range, 3) analyze tactical fit and alternatives, and 4) track updates on this rumor. I should also consider asking about the timeframe. I’ll create a concise reply in Chinese with these options to ensure clear communication.